|
Below, you'll find
extensive information on leading home articles and products to
help you on your way to success.
Benefits Of Home Ownership
By Leokadia
Buying a first home or unit as an
investment could be a better
financial proposition than buying a house to live in, particularly if
you and/or your partner pay income tax at a relatively high marginal
rate.
As an investor, you will be able to take full advantage of the negative
gearing provisions of the tax law. Negative gearing involves claiming a
tax deduction against taxable income for the interest and other
expenses which exceed the income from a rental real estate investment.
As an investor, you will have to rent a house or unit to live in while
buying an investment home. But the combined exercise of buying an
investment house or unit while you rent, or live free of rent at home,
can be a more attractive financial proposition than buying an
owner/occupied home.
Much depends on the rent you have to pay because - as with any
owner/occupied house mortgage - it comes from after-tax income. A good
rule of thumb is to consider negatively gearing an investment house
only when the cost of servicing the home mortgage and associated home
ownership costs (insurance, rates, repairs etc) exceeds the rent you
are paying by a substantial margin.
Consider an example of a young couple both earning $25,000 a year
currently renting for $200 a week. The couple has a $30,000 deposit to
put on a unit costing $130,000 (including fees and charges).
Buying the unit involves borrowing $100,000 to fund the purchase.
Taking the worst-case scenario, the couple will have to pay 14 per cent
interest on an investment loan. As owner/occupiers, they could obtain
an owner-occupied loan at an
interest rate of 12.5 per cent.
Owner/occupation would involve costs of about $300 a week made up of
about $250 a week interest costs on the loan at the 12.5 per cent rate
and another $50 a week expenses of owner/occupation.
Continuing to rent while buying an investment unit means paying $200 a
week in rent plus the negative gearing loss. Assuming that the unit
bought can also be rented out at $200 a week, the negatively geared
unit would involve total costs of about $330 a week (allowing for the
higher 14 per cent interest rate on the investment loan) and provide a
weekly income of $200 a week.
The loss on the investment for tax purposes would be $130 a week. The
couple pays tax at a marginal rate of 39.25 per cent (for all income
above $20,000) so the tax loss would generate a tax refund of 39.25 per
cent.
The after-tax cost of buying an investment while still renting would be
$79 a week (a $130 loss minus a $51 tax saving). This is $21 a week
lower than the $100 a week additional costs involved with
owner-occupation.
The financial advantage of negative gearing increases with the
taxpayer's marginal tax rate. For example, taxpayers with a taxable
income above $36,000 a year receive a tax deduction at a 47.25 per cent
rate compared with the 39.25 per cent rate used in this example.
Somewhat paradoxically, negatively gearing a house or unit involves
less financial risk than buying one to occupy. This is because of the
tax deduction available for any recurrent losses from the investment.
|
|
We strive to provide only quality
articles, so if there is a specific topic related to finances
that you would like us to cover, please contact us at any time.
And again, thank you to those
contributing daily to our home website.
|